Windows alternative to CX_DB8 requested by a user One commenter also suggests using embeddings trained on pubmed, like Elmo and Flair User heard that Agolo is a good summarizer but can’t try it since it doesn’t offer a free trialĬommenters suggest various tools, including:ĬX_DB8, a word level, queryable, extractive summarization tool with configurable underlining and highlighting Intellexer is an example of a tool that leaves important info out Online text summarizers have too many limits and leave out important info Text data includes ebooks, webpages, text files, etc and doesn’t have much jargon User is searching for a tool to summarize and extract important info from collected text on chronic illness research Reddit post from 3 years ago in r/LanguageTechnology with 4 points Source: "Best tools to summarize and analyze large amoun." (from reddit, r/LanguageTechnology)īest tools to summarize and analyze large amounts of text? None (for information on RSS reader apps or tools that use AI to summarize topics and trends) Upsum.io is mentioned as another tool to summarize any text like articles, research papers, even books in PDF format. One user asked if there was a feature to summarize YouTube videos and what makes Summary Box different from other tools Some users find it useful for getting a bunch of info in a short amount of time rather than just skimming the headlinesįeedback from one user suggests that some summaries were too long or copied word for word Has a free trial where you can use all features free for 5 daysĪfter that, you would have to upgrade, as the AI costs quite a bit to host Provides a dropdown with a summary of the page you’re viewing Summaries are written in the AI’s own words using a state-of-the-art model called GPT-3Ĭan be used to read news, blogs, research papers, school readings, and moreĬan be triggered any time you view an article, like on Wikipedia or Medium Source: "I built a Chrome extension that uses AI to summ." (from reddit, r/chrome)ĭescription of Summary Box Chrome extension that uses AI to summarize articles:Ĭan be used to summarize any article in your browser offers a 14-day trial to test the service, but a trial for Feedly Pro+ is not available as it costs around $4/user/month to run AI on top of all the articles.Inoreader added annotations so you can add a note to an article or a quote. Inoreader offers a “highlights feature” which lets users highlight keywords, making it easy to skim through titles and articles quickly.įeedly Pro+ offers a Leo AI that recognizes pharmaceutical drugs, cyber security, and other things. Inoreader users can manually create filters and rules to refine their search results and get the perfect result. The Reddit user prefers Inoreader over Feedly because of its powerful features and customer support. Inoreader’s highlights feature showcases specific keywords so that you can scan through RSS river, while Feedly Pro+ has none. Inoreader doesn’t have an AI integration, while Feedly Pro+ features an AI that has article summaries and highlights within articles. Inoreader doesn’t have WordPress integration, whereas Feedly Pro+ has a native WordPress share. Inoreader has rules, filters, and regular expressions which make it incredibly powerful, while Feedly Pro+ lacks this feature. Inoreader can generate RSS feeds for websites not offering them, while Feedly Pro+ doesn’t offer this option at all. Inoreader has unlimited subscriptions while Feedly Pro+ only has 5000. Inoreader has better keyboard integration and features full article inline, while Feedly Pro+ doesn’t have a similar feature. Inoreader requires active search for specific topics to follow, while Feedly Pro+ promises an “Leo-AI assistant”. Inoreader has Google News+ and Twitter included, whereas Feedly Pro+ has almost the same features. Inoreader costs USD 50 per year while Feedly Pro+ costs USD 99 per year for the first year and USD 144 subsequently. Inoreader and Feedly Pro+ are both RSS reader apps. Source: "Inoreader versus Feedly Pro+ (feature list comp." (from reddit, r/rss)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |